Rabbits don't drive electric cars: Difference between revisions
| (23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Screen Shot 2023-01-02 at 10.00.31 am.png | 900px]] | [[File:Screen Shot 2023-01-02 at 10.00.31 am.png | 900px]] | ||
= Travel in the Past = | = Travel in the Past = | ||
| Line 20: | Line 15: | ||
That’s not true. Lots of emissions are produced when mining materials to be used in electric cars, especially the battery and other electrical components. The battery along weighs 200kg. Emissions are produced at all stages of manufacture and in the transport over sea. These emissions are rarely counted. | That’s not true. Lots of emissions are produced when mining materials to be used in electric cars, especially the battery and other electrical components. The battery along weighs 200kg. Emissions are produced at all stages of manufacture and in the transport over sea. These emissions are rarely counted. | ||
There are also emissions during the running of the car because renewable energy sources still produce emissions | There are also emissions during the running of the car because renewable energy sources still produce emissions in their manufacture and working life. If the electric car is powered using coal power plants then it will release greenhouse gases. | ||
Just think, there are 8 billion people on Earth and everyone would like to get around in private cars. It will be impossible if we consider that each new car produces around 15 tonnes of GHG emissions. Cars also need more road space, car parking and garages. Approximately 20% of all the area in cities is devoted to cars. | |||
Electric cars produce waste. They need new tyres, brake pads and even new electric batteries. There is also waste produced during their manufacture. | |||
= Reducing GHG emissions from Transport = | = Reducing GHG emissions from Transport = | ||
| Line 32: | Line 29: | ||
* A round trip to Hawaii from Australia (18,000 km) will generate '''2.9 tonnes''' [https://co2.myclimate.org/en/ MyClimate]. This is about 160 (g.CO2-eq/km) | * A round trip to Hawaii from Australia (18,000 km) will generate '''2.9 tonnes''' [https://co2.myclimate.org/en/ MyClimate]. This is about 160 (g.CO2-eq/km) | ||
* A medium sized car will generate | * A medium sized car will generate 192 (g.CO2-eq/km) of CO2-equivalent emissions per km. If you travel 10km per day, over a year there will be '''700 kg CO2e''' of emissions. Most family cars travel greater distances and average emissions are closer to '''3 tonnes''' per year. | ||
= Less Energy Intensive Transport = | = Less Energy Intensive Transport = | ||
Here is a sliding scale for Energy intensive transport, starting with the least energy intensive | Here is a sliding scale for Energy intensive transport, starting with the least energy intensive | ||
# cycling | |||
# walking | |||
# telecommuting - more on this later | |||
# public transport | |||
# car pooling | |||
# electric cars and hybrids - still relatively high | |||
# private vehicles | |||
# air travel | |||
The GHG emissions associated with food intake required to fuel a kilometre of walking range between 50 gCO2e/km in the least economically developed countries to 260 gCO2e/km [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-66170-y Nature Report] | The GHG emissions associated with food intake required to fuel a kilometre of walking range between 50 gCO2e/km in the least economically developed countries to 260 gCO2e/km [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-66170-y Nature Report] | ||
| Line 59: | Line 56: | ||
* We should aim to reduce our transport to the bare essentials. | * We should aim to reduce our transport to the bare essentials. | ||
* A target of 3 tonnes / 15 = '''200 kg CO2 emissions per year''' is compatible with a 1.5 degreeC world. | * A target of 3 tonnes / 15 = '''200 kg CO2 emissions per year''' is compatible with a 1.5 degreeC world. | ||
* The 15 fold reduction is derived from reducing emissions from 15 tonnes/person/year to 1 tonne/person/year, with a 20% emission allocation to the transport sector. | |||
* If we divide the 200 kg by 48 working weeks in the year the result is '''4.16 kg CO2 per week'''. | * If we divide the 200 kg by 48 working weeks in the year the result is '''4.16 kg CO2 per week'''. | ||
* If we assume that the car is used 6 days per week the result is 4160 g / 6 = '''694 g CO2 per day'''. | * If we assume that the car is used 6 days per week the result is 4160 g / 6 = '''694 g CO2 per day'''. | ||
== Carbon footprint of | == Carbon footprint of different modes of transport == | ||
* The graph below shows the carbon foot print of different modes of travel [https://ourworldindata.org/travel-carbon-footprint] | * The graph below shows the carbon foot print of different modes of travel [https://ourworldindata.org/travel-carbon-footprint] | ||
* This data is based on UK and European data. Australian emissions will be slightly higher because of the absence of nuclear power. | * This data is based on UK and European data. Australian emissions will be slightly higher because of the absence of nuclear power. | ||
* Carbon emissions from walking and cycling are not shown. | * Carbon emissions from walking and cycling are not shown. | ||
* The carbon footprint of cycling one kilometre is usually in the range of 16 to 50 grams | * The carbon footprint of cycling one kilometre is usually in the range of 16 to 50 grams CO2e per km depending on how efficiently you cycle and what you eat. | ||
* The carbon footprint for walking will be approximately double the cycling footprint. | * The carbon footprint for walking will be approximately double the cycling footprint. | ||
* | * If we assume a carbon limit of '''694 g CO2e per day''' we can calculate the travel distance for each mode of transport. They are arranged from best to worst. | ||
** | ** Cycling ('''16 g/km''') = '''43 km/day''' | ||
** | ** Walking ('''32 g/km''') = '''21.7 km/day''' | ||
** Medium electric vehicle (53 g/km) = '''13.1 km/day''' | ** Train ('''41 g/km''') = '''16.9 km/day''' | ||
** | ** Medium electric vehicle ('''53 g/km''') = '''13.1 km/day''' | ||
** | ** Diesel Bus ('''105 g/km''') = '''6.6 km/day''' | ||
** Medium car petrol ('''192 g/km''') = '''3.6 km/day''' | |||
* This data shows that walking and cycling should be the main forms of transported supported in a 1.5 degC world. | |||
* Not shown is telecommuting (working from home on a computer). A typical business user may create 135kg CO2e from sending emails every year [https://hbr.org/2022/03/is-remote-work-actually-better-for-the-environment]. This translates to approximately 135 kg / (50 x 5) = '''540 g CO2e/work day''' | |||
[[File:Screen Shot 2023-01-02 at 4.09.56 pm.png | 900px]] | [[File:Screen Shot 2023-01-02 at 4.09.56 pm.png | 900px]] | ||
= How Green are Electric Bikes = | |||
* eBikes have a slightly lower carbon footprint than conventional bikes [https://www.bikeradar.com/features/long-reads/cycling-environmental-impact/] | |||
* Standard cycling has a carbon footprint of about '''21g of CO2 per kilometre''' | |||
* An ebike is estimated to have a footprint of '''14.8g CO2e per kilometre'''. | |||
** This takes electricity use into account 1.5g CO2e per/km | |||
** The average manufacturing carbon footprint of an ebike 134kg CO2e compared to a conventional bike 96kg (assuming 19,200km lifespan). | |||
** And a European, mostly vegetarian diet. | |||
= Back to Clover and Muffin = | = Back to Clover and Muffin = | ||
[http://www.waterwaysinwhittlesea.org/index.php?title=Main_Page#Clover_and_Muffin_Save_the_Planet Clover and Muffin Save the Planet] | [http://www.waterwaysinwhittlesea.org/index.php?title=Main_Page#Clover_and_Muffin_Save_the_Planet Clover and Muffin Save the Planet] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 19 January 2023
Travel in the Past
Rabbits don't travel very far. They stay in their same local area for most of their life.
Early humans were the same. It's only in recent times with the availability of cheap fossil fuels that humans have been able to travel such great distances in cars, planes, ships and even rockets.
Transport today contributes about 20% of all GHG emissions.
So as a general rule, the less we travel the lower our GHG emissions.
No Electric Cars are Zero Emission
We often hear politicians making claims that electric cars produce zero emissions. The assumption is that because electric cars produce zero emissions we can travel as far as we like.
That’s not true. Lots of emissions are produced when mining materials to be used in electric cars, especially the battery and other electrical components. The battery along weighs 200kg. Emissions are produced at all stages of manufacture and in the transport over sea. These emissions are rarely counted.
There are also emissions during the running of the car because renewable energy sources still produce emissions in their manufacture and working life. If the electric car is powered using coal power plants then it will release greenhouse gases.
Just think, there are 8 billion people on Earth and everyone would like to get around in private cars. It will be impossible if we consider that each new car produces around 15 tonnes of GHG emissions. Cars also need more road space, car parking and garages. Approximately 20% of all the area in cities is devoted to cars.
Electric cars produce waste. They need new tyres, brake pads and even new electric batteries. There is also waste produced during their manufacture.
Reducing GHG emissions from Transport
It may seem obvious, but there are two things we need to do to reduce the GHG emissions from transport.
- Travel less (stay mostly within your neighbourhood)
- Travel using less energy intensive transport (e.g. walking, biking, public transport, telecommuting)
Travelling Less Distance
- A round trip to Hawaii from Australia (18,000 km) will generate 2.9 tonnes MyClimate. This is about 160 (g.CO2-eq/km)
- A medium sized car will generate 192 (g.CO2-eq/km) of CO2-equivalent emissions per km. If you travel 10km per day, over a year there will be 700 kg CO2e of emissions. Most family cars travel greater distances and average emissions are closer to 3 tonnes per year.
Less Energy Intensive Transport
Here is a sliding scale for Energy intensive transport, starting with the least energy intensive
- cycling
- walking
- telecommuting - more on this later
- public transport
- car pooling
- electric cars and hybrids - still relatively high
- private vehicles
- air travel
The GHG emissions associated with food intake required to fuel a kilometre of walking range between 50 gCO2e/km in the least economically developed countries to 260 gCO2e/km Nature Report
Cycling produces half these emissions.
The lesson here is that all forms of transport generate emissions, even walking and cycling. There is no transport that produces zero emissions.
Embodied Emissions from Transport
When we make something like a bike or car we also release GHG emissions. This is because we need to mine materials from the ground, refine the materials, make and transport the finished item. All these steps produce GHG emissions and are difficult to avoid.
However if we care for a product we can avoid producing these embodied emissions again. Keeping things for longer is generally better than buying something new.
The Target
- We should aim to reduce our transport to the bare essentials.
- A target of 3 tonnes / 15 = 200 kg CO2 emissions per year is compatible with a 1.5 degreeC world.
- The 15 fold reduction is derived from reducing emissions from 15 tonnes/person/year to 1 tonne/person/year, with a 20% emission allocation to the transport sector.
- If we divide the 200 kg by 48 working weeks in the year the result is 4.16 kg CO2 per week.
- If we assume that the car is used 6 days per week the result is 4160 g / 6 = 694 g CO2 per day.
Carbon footprint of different modes of transport
- The graph below shows the carbon foot print of different modes of travel [1]
- This data is based on UK and European data. Australian emissions will be slightly higher because of the absence of nuclear power.
- Carbon emissions from walking and cycling are not shown.
- The carbon footprint of cycling one kilometre is usually in the range of 16 to 50 grams CO2e per km depending on how efficiently you cycle and what you eat.
- The carbon footprint for walking will be approximately double the cycling footprint.
- If we assume a carbon limit of 694 g CO2e per day we can calculate the travel distance for each mode of transport. They are arranged from best to worst.
- Cycling (16 g/km) = 43 km/day
- Walking (32 g/km) = 21.7 km/day
- Train (41 g/km) = 16.9 km/day
- Medium electric vehicle (53 g/km) = 13.1 km/day
- Diesel Bus (105 g/km) = 6.6 km/day
- Medium car petrol (192 g/km) = 3.6 km/day
- This data shows that walking and cycling should be the main forms of transported supported in a 1.5 degC world.
- Not shown is telecommuting (working from home on a computer). A typical business user may create 135kg CO2e from sending emails every year [2]. This translates to approximately 135 kg / (50 x 5) = 540 g CO2e/work day
How Green are Electric Bikes
- eBikes have a slightly lower carbon footprint than conventional bikes [3]
- Standard cycling has a carbon footprint of about 21g of CO2 per kilometre
- An ebike is estimated to have a footprint of 14.8g CO2e per kilometre.
- This takes electricity use into account 1.5g CO2e per/km
- The average manufacturing carbon footprint of an ebike 134kg CO2e compared to a conventional bike 96kg (assuming 19,200km lifespan).
- And a European, mostly vegetarian diet.